Two boards in one building.

The characteristic Indore problem is not volume. It is that a single centre is often running MP Board and CBSE sections at once, in both mediums, with overlapping faculty — and the checking has to work the same way for all of it.

One tool, both boards

MPBSE papers and CBSE papers differ in pattern and in what the marking scheme rewards. Deriving the scheme from your own question paper rather than from a fixed template is what lets both run side by side: an MP Board paper is marked as one, a CBSE paper as one, and neither is quietly forced into the other’s shape.

The same applies to medium. Hindi handwriting is read directly, including the Hindi-with-English-terms mix that is how most students actually write science.

What it changes for faculty shared across sections

A teacher covering both boards is marking two different papers on the same weekend. Removing the marking — not the judgement, the marking — is worth disproportionately more to them than to a teacher with one section, because the saving lands twice.

What they keep is the part that needs them: reading the answers that came back flagged, correcting anything the AI got wrong, and approving before a single mark reaches a student.

Practical notes for centres here

• Batch sizes are manageable. Most Indore batches are in the range where students photographing their own sheets works well, with no scanner needed.
• Weekly tests become affordable. When checking stops costing a weekend, test frequency is set by what students need rather than by what faculty can absorb.
• Section comparison comes free. The same paper marked across sections shows which questions each section actually lost, before the next class.